The statement that a nation should have a requirement that all students are to have the same education seems like a efficient strategy to prepare them all for college. No student would be deficient in their studies when the nation has a uniformed curriculum. Every student would be taught at the same pace. Even students from different districts would be able to help each other to study for exams, do homework, and work on projects together. This would bring teamwork and form great relationships between schools.
However, a curriculum like this would leave behind students with learning disabilities. Students with autism would not be able to keep up with the intensity of a normal curriculum. These students need to have specialized courses geared toward their needs or they will be left behind. If a nation just focused on maintaining the speed on the curriculum, students with learning disabilities will not benefit from this change. Students with learning disabilities can be a great asset to a nation. Albert Einstein had dsylexia but that did not stop him from becoming one of the greatest scientist in modern day science.
On the other side of the spectrum, there are students that excel at subject areas and can learn at extraordinary speeds compared to the average student. This kind of curriculum would hinder their potentials for growth and learning all for the sake of maintaining the set pace of learning. These remarkable students could excel at areas outside of the national curriculum, but would not be able to develop their innovative ideas that could be a solution to existing problems.
Besides the two extremes, school districts would not be able to cater to their demographic of students. Different demographics have different learning and cultural needs in order to be taught well. Schools that have spent decades in a district have the wisdom to discern specific methods that would only work in their school district. Depending on the city and country, a school district in one area can have a completely different culture than their neighboring district. Therefore, one set national curriculum would hinder their ability to teach their students properly.
At first glance, a set national curriculum sounds like a great strategy to keep all students on the same pace and guarentees every student starts at the same starting line. But, as we dig deeper into the issue, multiple glaring issues arise that would hinder the growth of the very students we aimed to educate properly. A national curriculum would not just hinder students, but stunt the growth of a nation.
The statement that a nation should have a requirement that all students are to have the same education seems like a efficient strategy to prepare them all for college. No student would be deficient in their studies when the nation has a uniformed curriculum. Every student would be taught at the same pace. Even students from different districts would be able to help each other to study for exams, do homework, and work on projects together. This would bring teamwork and form great relationships between schools.
However, a curriculum like this would leave behind students with learning disabilities. Students with autism would not be able to keep up with the intensity of a normal curriculum. These students need to have specialized courses geared toward their needs or they will be left behind. If a nation just focused on maintaining the speed on the curriculum, students with learning disabilities will not benefit from this change. Students with learning disabilities can be a great asset to a nation. Albert Einstein had dsylexia but that did not stop him from becoming one of the greatest scientist in modern day science.
On the other side of the spectrum, there are students that excel at subject areas and can learn at extraordinary speeds compared to the average student. This kind of curriculum would hinder their potentials for growth and learning all for the sake of maintaining the set pace of learning. These remarkable students could excel at areas outside of the national curriculum, but would not be able to develop their innovative ideas that could be a solution to existing problems.
Besides the two extremes, school districts would not be able to cater to their demographic of students. Different demographics have different learning and cultural needs in order to be taught well. Schools that have spent decades in a district have the wisdom to discern specific methods that would only work in their school district. Depending on the city and country, a school district in one area can have a completely different culture than their neighboring district. Therefore, one set national curriculum would hinder their ability to teach their students properly.
At first glance, a set national curriculum sounds like a great strategy to keep all students on the same pace and guarentees every student starts at the same starting line. But, as we dig deeper into the issue, multiple glaring issues arise that would hinder the growth of the very students we aimed to educate properly. A national curriculum would not just hinder students, but stunt the growth of a nation.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- The statement that a nation should have a requirement that all students are to have the same education seems like a efficient strategy to prepare them all for college. No student would be deficient in their studies when the nation has a uniformed curricu 50
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e to have the same education seems like a efficient strategy to prepare them all ...
^
Line 1, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rm great relationships between schools. However, a curriculum like this would le...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 617, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eatest scientist in modern day science. On the other side of the spectrum, there...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility to teach their students properly. At first glance, a set national curricul...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents, but stunt the growth of a nation.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11241217799 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69026210899 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473067915691 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6594313096 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2272727273 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4090909091 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486788220231 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157056021632 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157568079933 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296967797002 0.150359130593 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191404576187 0.0667264976115 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.