Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Educational institutions should not have a responsibility to hinder students from pursuing their fields on study. At first glance, this responsibility seems to be the best way to keep students on the appropriate track for success in their professional careers. However, a closer examination of the issue shows how detrimental this kind of responsibility will be to the students' academic success and growth.
To bear this type of responsibility, schools would need a way to effectively and efficiently evaulate what is defined as failure and success. There are times where schools only know what results the current methods represent. Students can overcome their disabilities and shortcomings with hardwork and determination. If it was the responsibility of the institutions he attended, Albert Einstein should have never became a scientist. Albert Einstein had dsylexia which should have prevented him from studying physics. If this were to happen, the world would have lost a great educator, teacher, and mentor.
But beyond the shortcomings of an effective way to gauge student success in a certain field, it is the choice of the students to have the free will to choose what they want to pursue. Without the freedom of choice, students will be hindered in their ability to grow as individuals by making the wrong choices and learning from their mistakes. If everything is predetermined, indidividuals would not be able to think critically and come up with their own solution when unexpected problems occur.
While it seems like schools should have the responsibility to choose for students so that they can success, there are detrimental drawbacks to this solution that would hinder the students growth and learning as they mature into adulthood. It would be irresponsible for educational instituitions to muddle the free will of students by predetermining the best path for a student's success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- The statement that a nation should have a requirement that all students are to have the same education seems like a efficient strategy to prepare them all for college. No student would be deficient in their studies when the nation has a uniformed curricu 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e students academic success and growth. To bear this type of responsibility, sch...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...nded, Albert Einstein should have never became a scientist. Albert Einstein had dsyle...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a great educator, teacher, and mentor. But beyond the shortcomings of an effect...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olution when unexpected problems occur. While it seems like schools should have ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... to this solution that would hinder the students growth and learning as they mature into...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s by predetermining the best path for a students success.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 301.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34219269103 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16263714415 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528239202658 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9346551926 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287364210432 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107376954247 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113136123727 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180640383874 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049718510227 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.