Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Many times, the scientific research and development fields hit a wall with the restrictions that the government has placed on their experiments. If only there were less rules, them the experiments could run it's full course and be able to discover something new. Even though these restrictions are in place, there are proper and good reasons why the rules are there. If scientific research and experiments are left to go amok, many participants would be harmed physically and mentally.
In the 18th and 19th century, there were little to no rules and restrictions in place for scientific experimentation. Scientists were able to design and proceed in doing experiments without much hinderance. Many of these experiments proved to be harmful to its participants. During the Stanford Prison experiment, half the participants were made to be prison guards and the other half were prisoners. As this experiment proceeded, the prison guards started to abused their power and psychically and mentally abused the prisoners with flogging, stripping them down, and torturing them. Due to the lack of rules and regulations, many of the prisoners had trauma and nightmares from the events that took place that should have never happened if there were sound guidelines. Now, there are guidelines in place that if physical or mental violence were the occur, then the experiments would be started immediately.
Even beyond trauma and physical violence, test subjects could be killed or physically and mentally incapacitated from lawless scientific experiments. In movies, there is sometimes a mad scientist who is trying to make a great achievement all in the name of science with little to no regard for human life. He or she will stop at nothing for the sake of discovery. Imagine if real life scientists had no accountability for their experiments. They could commit atrocities like murder and torture all in the cover of scientific research and development.
While it is clear now the drawbacks of having few to no restrictions on scientific research and development would not be ethical. It is wise of the governments to place rules and regulations on scientific research after seeing the horrors of unfettered experiments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The statement that a nation should have a requirement that all students are to have the same education seems like a efficient strategy to prepare them all for college. No student would be deficient in their studies when the nation has a uniformed curricu 50
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun rules is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... their experiments. If only there were less rules, them the experiments could run i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 854, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...hat if physical or mental violence were the occur, then the experiments would be started ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the horrors of unfettered experiments.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26685393258 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04331992645 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519662921348 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6189575554 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.166666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.05555555556 5.21951772744 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253804368092 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822610910345 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949798941912 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182789279787 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107276445587 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.