Cinema attendance by age group
The line chart illustrates the proportion of people attending the movie theatre and how these figures altered according to the age group in the UK from 1984 to 2000.
It is clear that a significant rise in total age groups attending cinema over the period given. Overall, a much larger number of people ranged 15-24 years old went to the cinema in comparison with three those kinds of age group.
In 1984, around 15% of those in the middle age group 15-24 attendance, compared to 10% of the youngest group and 5% of 25-35 age group. There was only 1 % number of attender in oldest group in particular. The fluctuation of those aged 15-24 was followed by a steady rose, first reaching roughly 45%, then plunged and bounced back again to 50% in 1994. By contrast, three out of the four age groups joining the movie theatre went up and down until the middle of the 1990s.
In the period between 1994 to 2000, wide fluctuations of those ranged from 7 to 35 went to the cinema as they hovered by nearly 5% with the exception for the oldest group which saw an increase. By 2000, it is thought that there was 55% respectively of 15-24 years old, while the figures for both 7-14 and 25-35 age groups joined to the cinema at nearly 30%. Moreover, the percentage of the over 35s was recorded the lowest figures with 15%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | Zahid6400 | 56 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | Sajib Ahamed | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 70 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | vuongthaolinh | 84 | view |
- the chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 200 2019 and future 2025 92
- Test 3 Cam 9 The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railwaysystems in six cities. 78
- Writing task 1 The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the oldest'.
Suggestion: in the oldest
... There was only 1 % number of attendees in oldest group in particular. The fluctuation of...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51882845188 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32504480244 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531380753138 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4641161647 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44318708332 0.215688989381 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18958136414 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128324045334 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289303117077 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103132955849 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.