The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands
The diagrams compare the differences of the cross-sections of two tunnels. Figure 1 shows the cross-section of a road tunnel joining two European countries; while figure 2 illustrates a railway tunnel linking two islands in Japan.
Overall, as can be seen from the diagrams, the Seikan Railway Tunnel took such a longer construction time compared to the Mont-Blanc Road Tunnel. Also, the Japanese railway tunnel is significantly longer than the road one.
The Seikan Railway Tunnel was built under the sea to link the two Japanese cities in two islands namely Hakodate City and Aomori City. It took 42 years to completely finished, from 1946 to 1988, 34 years longer compared to the road tunnel built under Mont-Blanc to join French and Italy, which was built between 1956 and 1965.
The depth of the Mont-Blanc Road Tunnel is 3,5 km; whereas that of the Seikan Railway Tunnel is just 24m. However, the latter has a length of 53,85 km compared to 11,60 km of the former.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-17 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 59
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... completely finished, from 1946 to 1988, 34 years longer compared to the road tun...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9156626506 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62664418781 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4766522208 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226660304807 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122394584048 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136975265044 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152440064839 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169100323828 0.0819641961636 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.