The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012.
The maps illustrate the development of a town called Frenton between 1990 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the Frenton had fewer trees and more buildings appeared than 32 years ago.
Over the period surveyed, only the school and library in the west of High Street remained unchanged. The playing field with trees in the north of Frenton was replaced with numerous flats, while the hospital was expanded to meet the citizens’ needs. The bank in the west was demolished to make space for a new restaurant; whereas the trees in the southwest were cut down for a technopark construction.
Meanwhile, the café and park area in East High Street was replaced with a hotel and golf course. Houses in East Frenton were reconstructed into blocks of flats and there were also groups of flats in the north of the town. In Southwest Frenton, the theatre and shops were replaced with a new cinema and supermarket respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | Lovepreet123 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | YESWANTH KALUVA | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-09 | Laura Jesiska Sitorus | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-08 | kevinzultaf | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-01 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their children’s studies. On the contrary, those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental development. What is your opinion? 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 73
- Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their children’s studies. On the contrary, those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental development. What is your opinion? 73
- The table below gives information on households with a regular use of car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 85
Comments
Thank you for investing your…
Thank you for investing your time and creativity to create such valuable content. It's appreciated!CINCH Playoffs Your words have the power to inspire and educate. Thanks for sharing your incredible gift.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89873417722 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67789589455 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0728062344 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.75 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132266656581 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710329891511 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121537778764 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126725505747 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150978836904 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.