The graph shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011
The line chart compares the average price of a barrel of oil with the food index over the period of 11 years.
it is clear that the prices for both commodities rose stably between 2000 and 2011. Furthermore , the global prices of food and oil were as similar by the time, with a strong correlation 93,6% is suggested.
In the year 2000, the price of oil was close to $25 per barrel and the food price index was just under 90 points. Following four years, the global price of food and oil reminded stably. but by 2007, the price of oil was much higher than double while the food index stood at nearly 120 points.
The big change for both commodities were in 2008. The average oil price reached at peak of approximately $140 while food went up to 220 points. By 2009, the global prices for both commodities were a slight down but it rose significantly once time again until 20011. The average food price index reached at peak of just under 240 points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- The graph below shows US consumers'average annual expenditures on cell phone and residental phone services between 2000 and 2011. 56
- The table shows the amount of money give in aid technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 61
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development ? 61
- With more and more people communicating via computers and smart phones. There is a real danger that we are losing the ability to communicate with others face to face. Do you agree or disagree. 56
- The diagram show the life cycle of a honey bee 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood index over the period of 11 years. it is clear that the prices for both com...
^^
Line 2, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...d index over the period of 11 years. it is clear that the prices for both commo...
^^
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tably between 2000 and 2011. Furthermore , the global prices of food and oil were ...
^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... price of food and oil reminded stably. but by 2007, the price of oil was much high...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24424625892 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2939906414 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.7 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379437653055 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164568930338 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672105849141 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243669049365 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831370385045 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.19 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.