TPO-49: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reason

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... important to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long time than to easily ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
...than to easily make many new friends. those long-lasting friendships are better bec...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and important than anything in a world. With those you'll make lots of memo...
^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and you can rely ln them for anything friends are family that we choose and th...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 52.1666666667 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 594.0 1977.66487455 30% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 122.0 407.700716846 30% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86885245902 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.32345618554 4.48103885553 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4992339595 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 212.727598566 36% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 171.9 618.680645161 28% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 20.6003584229 15% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.1344086022 199% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.323919824 48.9658058833 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 198.0 100.406767564 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.6666666667 20.6045352989 197% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276477358385 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243112329603 0.076458572812 318% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13986024269 0.0737576698707 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211202824091 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133116124831 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 11.7677419355 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.1575268817 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 13.0 86.8835125448 15% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.0537634409 179% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.