Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
In this modern era, information about the scientific area, business or educational field is easy to look for just by several steps through the Internet. As a result, some people contend that the information should be shared freely; however, others oppose that the knowledge is too valuable and imperative to be uploaded widely. In my opinion, I do support the first argument since there are several convincing reasons.
On the one hand, people who support that the knowledge in scientific research, business, and the academic areas should be shared as much as possible since they believe in their rights in this 21st century. On the human right perspective, as citizens, they are allowed to know almost everything from the government or other organizations like political situations, new breakthroughs, economic strategies and the like. In terms of learning resources, it is highly necessary to catch up with the latest news from the scientists. There are numerous patients who are waiting for a successful cure for their detrimental cancers or diseases. Moreover, information from those fields is worthy for educational reasons since students should be taught with the lasted piece of information.
On the other hand, sharing important information related to science, economic or academic world is considered not an appropriate action. Firstly, the knowledge belongs to those who own it; therefore, it needs their agreement before being publicized. Otherwise, the action of spreading news illegally is sentenced heavily. Secondly, if the valuable knowledge is captured by bad people, it will cause severe effects on not only individuals but also the community. For example, the method of creating a new genre of a plant must be kept secret since there will be thousands of companies do experiments or produce the new product without the scientific examination or the authority’s permission. Consequently, detrimental influences on the ecosystems or the economy are undeniable results.
From all the above-mentioned. Important information which is suitable for citizens should be publicizing freely; whereas others should be kept for safety reasons. Moreover, people should extremely protect knowledge about dangerous subjects like nuclear power and genetic research in order to prevent further harms happen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- The main purpose of a public library is to provide books, and they shouldn’t waste the limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, video, and DVDs.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statemen 73
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 94
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54929577465 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03255365498 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585915492958 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7954034375 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.882352941 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29920120414 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768336934506 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106271467956 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173543810476 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658403978345 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.