The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010.
The given pie charts illustrate the percentage of pupils at an England university capable of speaking an extra language other than English during the years 2000 and 2010.
We can see that Spanish was the most sought language among the university students. All the percentages of students speaking an additional language increased in general, apart from French during the timeline. German language saw no change in popularity over the period.
The percentage of students speaking one other language and two extra languages rose by 5 percent each to 20 percent and 15 percent respectively. While Spanish-speaking students rose by 5 percent from 30 percent in 2000 to 35 percent in 2010, French language saw a decreasing trend by falling from 15 percent in 2000 to 10 percent in 2010.
Students speaking German as an additional language remained constant at 10 percent.
So, to conclude, we can say that Spanish was the top spoken extra language and students of the university increased their other language speaking competencies in general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Tejas Dalwadi | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Tejas Dalwadi | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | BlackDelta | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | Adithya999 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two period. 67
- The bar chart below shows the US top ten processed food export markets 80
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevantexamples from yo 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pils at an England university capable of speaking an extra language other than En...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, apart from, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25595238095 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88743245055 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511904761905 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8012008576 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272327185804 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134871846856 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652968615477 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174267205848 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450180041489 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.