Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
Technology has revolutionized the way we communicate with each other. People has shifted from old fashioned face to face communication to technology dependent digital communication. This may have some negative on our society but the advantage it brings is greater than the disadvantage.
If we look back as early as twenty five years then we could see a totally different way of communication. People did not have any mobile phone, posted letters used to take months to deliver. However, the scenario has changed dramatically, we can communicate with anyone within seconds, talk to someone in real time thanks to the technology. Apart from that, technology has brought the entire world within the palm of our hand, people can meet people from anywhere in the world visa social media. It is not like meeting random people across the world even we can choose who we want to meet from which country. Where previously communication between people were limited to only local people.
We cannot deny the implications it brought along with it. For example, social networking website like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter has made ourself addicted to it and indirectly forcing us to spend time with it. Moreover this trend made us less aware of real life and our surrounding. People became so addicted that they give more priority to this virtual world than the real world, they are more concern regarding what they upload to the social media rather than, what is actually happening in real life.
On the flip side, the technology is not social media rather it is just a part of it. If we look elsewhere it will give us a different story. The entire world is dependent on technology starting from a simple text message to the stock market. The world economy is moving forward leveraging the power of technology. World trade, banking system, stock market are all dependent on technology.Therefore, A day without technology is unthinkable hence technology is serving us in many ways.
To sum up, technology has almost changed the way we communicate. People tend to emphasize on the negative aspect of the aspects of the technology by pointing their finger towards social media but the actual benefit is offers us is greater than the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, which is important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 78
- At present time, the population of present countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with a number of older people.do the advantage of this situation outweigh the disadvantage? 61
- Research shows that business meetings and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Some people say that excessive noise should be a criminal offence While other say that they should be free to make noise without limitation 63
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gs is greater than the disadvantage. If we look back as early as twenty five ye...
^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...who we want to meet from which country. Where previously communication between people...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ectly forcing us to spend time with it. Moreover this trend made us less aware of real l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l media rather it is just a part of it. If we look elsewhere it will give us a dif...
^^
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Everything
...imple text message to the stock market. everything is connected together. World trade, ban...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, apart from, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03151862464 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71088641986 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54441260745 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0615288744 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214790965437 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653731089631 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578307492027 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118724620184 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546586263837 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.