Witnessed by the rapid progress of economy throughout the world, governments are more willing to support the research than ever before. In many countries, science researches become one of the main focus of the country, meanwhile consuming a huge amount of money. As a result, a debate on whether the authorities should support scientific research that does not have particle uses, remains wide-spread. For my part, I think it is necessary for the authorities to support those researches.
Admittedly, scientific researches which have an immediate benefit are welcomed through both the governments and the investors. To governments, since the research institution could afford their expenditure themselves, government could save some money and invest it on other infrastructure parts. To investors, together with a good reputation of supporting science, their investing also makes big money for them. To be specific, a further example comes mainly from some popular parts such as computer science. According to Xinhua News Agents 3 March, the total number of Internet users had increased to 4.0 billion globally until 2018. The large demand from users contribute to the huge profits of the field. The prosperity of the computer science definitely brings our life quite a lot immediately, but this does not mean those researches that do not have an obviously benefit are meaningless.
Researches seem useless today might create a huge amount of possibility in the future. When Einstein first put forward The Relativity Theory, it is hard for common people at that time to imagine the deep influence the theory brings. One of the applications of the theory is GPS, which make it possible for the airplane to cross miles over the ocean and bring people abroad back to their home. That is just one typical ‘useless’ research at that time, but is proved to be one of most essential found in the 20th century. Government focusing on the current benefits are short-sight, for even the cleverest man finds it hard to see the potentials of a research in a long term.
Since some of the researches do not produce immediate benefits in a short term, the invests from the countries become more vital to the research institution. Public investors focus on short term profits, who are unlikely to be attracted by researches with low input-output ratio. Some treatments and medicine research of rare diseases are cited as example, which usually consume a huge amount of equipment, but have a relative small chance to succeed. Even if those researches succeed, due to the rarity of the diseases, the profits are hardly to cover the cost. Without the governments’ help, it would be hard for these kind of researches to be conducted.
In a nutshell, based on the previous discussion, although the future usage of some scientific researches remain unclear, I believe the government should still put some efforts on supporting them.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should support scientific research that does not have any practical use in the short term 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should support scientific research that does not have any practical use in the short term 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 70
- In 20 years from now on, students will not use printed books anymore. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...s, science researches become one of the main focus of the country, meanwhile consuming a h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nvesting also makes big money for them. To be specific, a further example comes ma...
^^
Line 3, column 856, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('obviously') instead an adjective, or a noun ('benefit') instead of another adjective.
... mean those researches that do not have an obviously benefit are meaningless. Researches seem use...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 658, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... finds it hard to see the potentials of a research in a long term. Since some of the re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... of a research in a long term. Since some of the researches do not produce immediate ben...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 621, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...nments' help, it would be hard for these kind of researches to be conducted. In a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, while, i think, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19157894737 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9393092825 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553684210526 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2917037679 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.090909091 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5909090909 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244099786237 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698952397954 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608965248042 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142932422076 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415274130418 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.