shortened work week
The reading and the lecture are both about reducing workweek to 4 days, offered to employees for 80% of their normal salary.The author believes that shortened workweek can benefit companies and employees. The lecturer challenges these claims made by author. He is of the opinion that none of these views is correct.
First, the author contends that decreased work days and hiring new employee to make up the same amount of works, improves the company's benefits.This argument is refuted by the lecturer. He states that adding new staffs requires companies to spend more money for medical benefits that is as the amount as for five days workers. In addition, it needs more work spaces and computers for additional workers.
Secondly, the writer of the reading states that shortened work weeks decrease the unemployment rate. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that since hiring new workers is costly so, companies would raise their expectation from current employees to work more over shortened timework as the normal five days employees do. He points out that in this way conversely the unemployment rate is increased also, the current jobs would be unpleasant.
Finally, it is stated in the article that it would be better for four days employee to have more time for their personal life. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that it would harms their chances for advancing in their career. Moreover they will be first employees will fire in financial depression so that they will not have job stability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...mployees for 80% of their normal salary.The author believes that shortened workweek...
^^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ek can benefit companies and employees. The lecturer challenges these claims made b...
^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...f works, improves the companys benefits.This argument is refuted by the lecturer. He...
^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'harm'
Suggestion: harm
...on the other hand, posits that it would harms their chances for advancing in their ca...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... chances for advancing in their career. Moreover they will be first employees will fire ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11952191235 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55101440242 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557768924303 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5949313524 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.083333333 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162465616447 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664473135996 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116708982907 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953586958787 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956296297506 0.0443174109184 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.