Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it's actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and the implications.
Recently, the pheenomenon of governments promise the continuous economic growth, but it's actually an illusion and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regraded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive. I am inclined to believe that some people think that governments should abandon economic growth can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, governments should promise abandon the continuous economic growth can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the continuous economic growth should be abandon by governments might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is true to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of to abandon the continuous economic growth, the government should promise far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
- Some people point that experiential( i.e learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. What is your opinion? 85
- The advanced medical technology will expand human's life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse? 88
- What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions. 88
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics or the airplane. Why? explain with examples. 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children's act . What is your opinion? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8122605364 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17711628817 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624521072797 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1934318346 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.909090909 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389924440408 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130759769183 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113537363145 0.071462118173 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229988886684 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602207322309 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.