TPO 47 - Integrated Writing Task
In this set materials, the reading passage state that Pterosaurs would not be able to fly, and brings several reasons such as being cold-blooded, having high wight and having a week back leg muscles for claiming. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that the Pterosaurs were cold-blooded; thus, they had a low metabolism rate and could not have enough energy for flight. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that fossils of the Pterosaurs have shown that Pterosaurs had dense hair cover or feathers. As we know, only warm-blooded animals have a feather on their body for preventing loos their body temperatures in cold weather. Therefore, the Pterosaurs were warm-blooded; hence, they had enough energy and high metabolism rate for flying.
Second, the reading passage argues that the Pterosaurs had a high weight; therefore, they would not be able to flight; conversely, what the speaker believes is different. She points that anatomy of the Pterosaurs shows some hollow in their bone. These hollow make their weigh become light. Also, their weight is low comparison their size. Hence, they had not a problem with their weight.
Finally, according to the reading, the Pterosaurs had week mascles for taking off comparison birds that have strong muscles. However, the professor claims that birds and Pterosaurs have different. Birds only use two limbs for jumping and taking off. But, the Pterosaurs used 4 legs and limbs for taking off and jumping not used only 2 back legs. Thus, the Pterosaurs had the ability to push the earth and jumping or taking off.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-30 | mahi22 | 3 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | mahi22 | 81 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2018-11-07 | tarannomkhak | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-31 | sajjadsafari | 61 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
- TPO 45 3
- TPO 25 80
- Do you agree or disagree? Parents today are more involved in their children education than were parents in the past 76
- TPO 25 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18571428571 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58068769509 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521428571429 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9283596189 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.