Scientist have been warning for many years about the importance of protecting the environment and that we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take an interest in protecting environment?
It is long been said by many generations and scientists to preserve environment either as a warning or as a request. Consequences of extreme use of energy resources have led people to confront global warming’s multiple issues. Despite these many requests and warnings people still do not restrict the use of energy resources. There are two main reasons: people are so accustomed to use those sources that now it is impossible for them to live without, companies which are selling those energies has made this generation so addictive that they do not have any other option.
When any new way is introduced to cut down physical work, people blindly accept the suggested path, without even care about the adverse effects on the environment. In turn, they are so indoctrinated with these resources that those become the integral part of their lifestyle. For example, when cars are launched then people abruptly purchased cars for their comfort, they did not even think for a second that what level of damage it could make in future if cars become ubiquitous. Now, even though, everyone knows that cars produce carbon footprint and cars have been deteriorating the environmental stability, still they are not ready to reduce the use of cars so that carbon level in the atmosphere would decrease.
Consequently, industries which promote various product had made today’s generation paralysed, in term of using selecting tools over an over. So many mobile games companies have been advertising various games, which not only make teenagers addictive but also consume a large amount of mobile’s battery. In fact, because of extensive use of phone, electricity consumption level increased at an exponential rate. Additionally, phones also produce some frequencies which are harmful for the birds and humans also in long haul. For example, Vodaphone, network provider has requested people to use their mobile phones as optimum as they can. It also warns about harmful radiations, but because of large amount of Vodaphone's advertisements people are overlooking warning and continuing as the same.
There are several graceful and forceful technical solutions to make confine the usage of energy sources. Firstly, the government could launch some scheme where the people having very less usage of personal cars can avail tax reductions. Secondly, the government would put some harsh penalty on those who exceed the pre-defined usage of mobile networks.
To deduce, addiction is the problem, no one can escape easily. So, forceful steps from the respective government would do the trick in order to save the environment.
- Scientist have been warning for many years about the importance of protecting the environment and that we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons for that and how people can be en 78
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but other think studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your opinion. 73
- Online education and training is becoming increasingly popular in the business world Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 95
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable, discuss both views and give opinion 89
- Some people say a person’s success in adult life is the result of the way they brought up as a child by their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2966507177 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81914833834 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564593301435 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7896216918 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.526315789 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269972349173 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810726472369 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723011312044 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136888710106 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999983327154 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.