Some people think that large international sporting events only brings drawbacks, and that it is not worth hosting them.
Do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary era, countries government is trying to get traction via hosting international sporting event. However, some countrymen believe that it brings uncertain issues, and they advice to avoid this sort of sporting events. I strongly believe in the opposite notion and confirms that these events brings fame to the nation and international exposure to local sport persons.
When any of the government request respective sport authorities to host an event in their country, at that time the government is also looking for other benefits, event might bring to the nation such as fame. In turn, this honour would bring more tourist along with international players, ultimately, via tourism the government raises economical standard of local businessmen’s. For instance, CWG was held at New Delhi in 2011, it had brought lot of additional income to the nearby shopkeepers, hotels and traveling consultants. Moreover, after completing the aforementioned event, the government had contemplated that regional influx of tourist had been increased as the city is also known for its political history and ancient monuments.
On the other hand, many of the country’s sport person got international exposure, through the event they can afford to participate at the optimum rate. Local players had competed with foreign athletes and proved themselves worthy even in the international market. In turn, the event has brought glory to respective country, plus, via wast exposure, participents confidence level also increased. For example, many of the star players had been identified by the government of India and supported them to participate in other international events as they then had needed exposure. This one event not only strengthens the relation between the government and local players, but also brings fame to the nation.
To conclude, by summarising the aforesaid anecdote, I can say that these type of events only bring prosperity to nation. If, any country continue to host events then their local players, businessmen and in turn the government itself would reaps the benefits in a long haul.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-25 | niks23 | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-01 | drtruong92 | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-30 | bloomingme | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | abhi1389 | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | abhi1389 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable, discuss both views and give opinion 89
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Some people prefer cold weather conditions while other don’t discuss both the view and give your opinion. 73
- More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work.What Will be the consequences of this? What solutions can you offer? 73
- Many people say that globalisation and the growing number of multinational companies have a negative effect on the environment Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: ADVICE_ADVISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (verb) instead of advice (noun)?
Suggestion: advise
...at it brings uncertain issues, and they advice to avoid this sort of sporting events. ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this sort of sporting events. I strongly believe in the opposite notion and confi...
^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'reap'
Suggestion: reap
...and in turn the government itself would reaps the benefits in a long haul.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, sort of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42598187311 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02393527018 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549848942598 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8452892745 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204375690135 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817762010844 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462043655905 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142536709408 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045566073437 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.