The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

Submitted by antonio on Sun, 02/03/2019 - 08:14

The bar charts compare the degree of involvement in education and science of underdeveloped and developed countries in both 1980 and 1990.

Overall, it is clear that industrialized countries are much more involved in promoting their population to achieve a very high level of technical knowledge, as well as in investing larger amounts of money in R&D (research and development).

Regarding the differences on technical training, figures for schooling years in developing countries stood at nearly 3 in 1980 and slightly more than 3 in 1990, compared to roughly 8 and 10, respectively, in developed countries. Furthermore, there was about a fourfold difference in the proportion of scientists and technicians of both groups in 1980. By 1990, this gap had widened even further, with figures of around 7% and 2% in developed and underdeveloped countries.

As for R&D, developed countries invested roughly thrice as much as underdeveloped countries (approximately 50 and 150 billion dollars). In 1990, this difference was much higher as figures for undeveloped countries shrank to less than $50b and those of developed countries rose dramatically to about $350b.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-08 happyhappy 73 view
2019-12-12 Lê Thị Hà 11 view
2019-11-11 Mario Nese 78 view
2019-02-03 antonio 84 view
2019-02-03 antonio 84 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user antonio :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...n 1990, this difference was much higher as figures for undeveloped countries shran...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, well, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41436464088 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29998478416 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0540941919 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223108212136 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112740317438 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717330852362 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14934171253 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758754805468 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.