TPO-35-1
The reading introduces three theories to explain the origin of the Voynich manuscript. While, the professor completely disagrees with these reasons and refutes them.
Firstly, although, the reading claims that the manuscript is a smart work on some scientific or magical subject which was included a complex secret code, the professor argues that not only this manuscript had been wrote by ordinary scientists, but also it contains common contents such as herbal witch is mentioned in this book and another sources.
Secondly, the text claims that the manuscript is fake and its text has no true meaning. Controversy, the professor opines that in the nineteenth century, people was not intrested to secret manuscripts to spend a lot of money for purchasing them. Furthermore, for creating a fake book, there is not necessary to spend a lot of time, While, Voynich manuscript needs a lot of efforts to write.
Eventually, though, the reading claims that this manuscript is a modern fake, the professor rejects this theory, since he believes that volume pages an ink which was used in this book is related to at least hundred years ago.
- Tpo -48-1 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally; one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Tpo-38-1 3
- 33-1 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'written'.
Suggestion: written
... that not only this manuscript had been wrote by ordinary scientists, but also it con...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...sed in this book is related to at least hundred years ago.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 187.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09625668449 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69428513893 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620320855615 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.5218431188 49.2860985944 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.142857143 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 7.06452816374 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.