I completely agree with the statement that teachers ought to not reveal their personal political and social views to their fellows. In my perspective, there are several courses which a student needs to learn at a school and teachers should concentrate on best ways to teach them to students. Another thing is that pupils usually are not mature enough to reflect on complicated social and political matters; therefore, they would blindly accept whatever their teachers state.
First of all, teachers need to ensure students learn essential materials which they must to comprehend. They have to perform a variety of tasks such as checking homework and projects, give multiple quizzes and also discuss courses in the classroom. Thus, it is a totall waste of time if they talk about political and social matters instead of their courses. It not only distract students' attention but also they will not be prepared for their jobs in the future.
Another reason is that students usually are not experienced enough to considering these sort of issues. It goes without saying understanding political and social events are tough because once need to read a lot about history, economics and sociology to hold logical views. On the other hand, students are in their early stages of life and unaware of what going on around them; they heavily rely on their parents and teachers points of view, and they can bias their attitude. Once an opinion set on someone's mind, there is a low chance to change them. For example, when I was at elementary school, one of my teachers keeps claiming that we should devote our life to annihilating Israel. But when I grew up, I exert myself understanding the stupidity of his outlook about promoting war.
Last but not least, talking about digressing issues could undermine teachers and students relationship. For instance, when a student's opinions contradict with his or her teacher's views, they could not effectively communicate with each other. Having not in common would decrease students motivation for learning from their teachers.
For all the reasons that I have stated, I assume teachers should let their students develop their own opinions. If we want to have a utopia, we need independent thinkers who can easily share their perspective with one another. Plus, school is the place where students learn basic skills; they are not capable of contemplating tough issues in their society.
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- TPO 5 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 7
- TOEFL TPO 13 - Integrated Writing Task 88
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...ts learn essential materials which they must to comprehend. They have to perform a vari...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...e not experienced enough to considering these sort of issues. It goes without saying under...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e should devote our life to annihilating Israel. But when I grew up, I exert myse...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, therefore, thus, another thing, for example, for instance, sort of, such as, talking about, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11055276382 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61641165709 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565326633166 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1934939488 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.052631579 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15789473684 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250744341913 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817319745801 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680127273261 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154866988684 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527880563593 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.