It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
“Child is the father of man”, children imitate everything from their surroundings. Punishment, deserve to the one who conveys the wrong manners/though to the next ones. I strongly agree with the viewpoint that punishment is necessary to teach good behavior to children. In this essay, I will prove that why parents and teachers should punish to the bad children.
Those who agree with the view that parents and teachers should not allow using punishment to teach children have a number of reasons to support their view. Abuse, what suffers in someone early lives can affect to their whole life. Most of the supporters of this view accepted that “if someone intentionally do the mistakes, forgive it”. Listen to the reasons and explain the consequences of their mistakes. Punishment is not the right way to react to the children.
Nevertheless, the opponents of the view mentioned above have their own points as well. Taking action is the best thing to remember his/her mistake. For example, if the young child said the bad words, explain the meanings of that words first. If she/he do that mistake again, punish him/her to remember for the whole life. Not to remember the kind of punishment, just to aware why he/she was punished. No need to punish with severe methods, and it will be better if how they take responsibilities to their mistakes is added in the ways of punishment.
To sum up, if we practice the law of “An eye for an eye”, the whole world will be blind. Therefore, not to be a blind world, we need to teach children about the mistakes and responsibilities since their young ages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | eslamyousry | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | shihan99 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | kingdangyeu0606 | 22 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Mimibae 985 | 56 | view |
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- the maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- These days, people change career several times during their life. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...ted that 'if someone intentionally do the mistakes, forgive it'. Listen ...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...meanings of that words first. If she/he do that mistake again, punish him/her to r...
^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esponsibilities since their young ages.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93090909091 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78851481546 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8681259818 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7647058824 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203792925869 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666630540347 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657956659681 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124091599693 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658724810297 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.