The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004.
The bar chart compares the yearly salary of doctors and others workers in several countries in the year 2004.
Overall, it is clear that doctors were paid much more than other workers. Doctors in the US had salaries far higher than doctors in the other countries.
Contrast to doctors in the US had the highest earnings with 120000 US dollars each year, doctors in Finland had the lowest earnings with around 25000 dollars. Doctors in France and Switzerland
had more than a half of the US doctors’s salaries, at 70000 dollars, higher than 60000 dollars in Italy, Czech and Germany.
The other workers in the US and Switzerland had the highest earnings with 45000 and 40000 dollars. In Finland and France, annual pay for the workers were a half, around 25000-30000 dollars, higher than in Italy, Czech and Germany with the same salaries, at 20000 dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-30 | Thang Tran | 89 | view |
- many people disagree with a school policy which forces children to learn new languages. 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 67
- The chart below show the percentage of water use by different sectors in sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 73
- people have little understanding of the importance of the natural world 84
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today. What are the causes of Global warming and what measures can government and individuals take to tackle the issue? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llars. Doctors in France and Switzerland had more than a half of the US doctors&a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92465753425 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41928240983 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493150684932 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 191.7 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9897945831 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284859865362 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148362958274 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537834781652 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168400065228 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543119680071 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.