The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994

Essay topics:

The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994

The graph compares Canada, Japan, Peru and Angola in terms of living standard indicators, namely yearly earning per person, average age, daily calorie supplying per person and literacy rate in the year 1994.
Overall, Canada and Japan citizens occupied better living standards with figures of all four categories were higher than that of Peru and Angola citizens. Angola registered the lowest indexes in all of given indicators among the nations compared in the table.
Japan and Canada had the same index of adult literacy rate, at 99%. However, average earning and life expectancy at birth of Japaneses were slightly higher than Canadians, with 15760 US dollars and 78 years compares to 11100 US dollars and 76 years, respectively. Daily calorie consumption of a Canadian with 3326 calories was much higher than that of a resident in other countries, in a doubling figure compares to an Angola’citizen with 1749 calories.
Angola had the lowest figures in the given indicators, with 130 US dollars in average yearly income, 47 years in average age and only 34 in 100 persons were literate. Peru‘adult literacy rate was twice as high as Angola’with 68%.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-19 nobitaa 73 view
2024-08-19 nobitaa 84 view
2024-08-19 nobitaa 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mong the nations compared in the table. Japan and Canada had the same index of a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Angola'citizen with 1749 calories. Angola had the lowest figures in the giv...
^^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... twice as high as Angola'with 68%.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21693121693 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8704276687 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.868793962 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0270691995181 0.215688989381 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0147594889127 0.103423049105 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0197982308905 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0219876969555 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243278952903 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.