The chart below show the percentage of water use by different sectors in sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007.
The pie charts compare the water usage in various sectors in Sydney, Australia in the year 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it is apparent that food industry used most amount of water in the total water use. After ten years, proportion of water used by service industry jumped to double.
According to the charts, the were significant rises in proportion of water used in service industry and household. The water use of service industry increased dramatically by 12%, from 13% in 1997 to 25% in 2007. Household also had a slight rise in water use, from 19% to 21%, between 1997 and 2007.
Contrast to proportion of water usage in service industry and household, there were a significant decrease in building, manufacturing and food industry. In the period of 1997-2007, water use decreased by 7% and 4% in food industry and manufacturing, respectively. In building industry, the water use had a nose-diving, decreased by over a half from 5% to 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Drragkloha | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Lucy_067 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | BangLangTim | 78 | view |
- Manifacture bricks for the building industry 84
- Some people arrgue that girls and boys should be educated saparately while others think that it is more advantaguous for children to study at a same school. What is your opinion? 73
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today. What are the causes of Global warming and what measures can government and individuals take to tackle the issue? 84
- many people disagree with a school policy which forces children to learn new languages. 78
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88419724534 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50625 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2142841563 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.1111111111 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332449823497 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172644286787 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10377535721 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246040884228 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100370591113 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.