Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone?
People do different kinds of things to be productive in life. But the topic of ways of being effective in life always creates debate among people; some people believes that people can be constructive even though they a routine job while other is of the opinion that to be constructive people should try different thing. This essay will further elaborate on this topic.
To begin with, people can be successful in life by doing the same type of job over and over again. When people do the same type of job millions of times they become better at that job and consequently excel in that particular professional field. For example, a person who has been doing auditing for 10 years will be easily able to detect any errors in accounts than a person who has recently started doing auditing. Therefore, doing the routine job can be monotonous and dull but there is no denial that the people who do this type of job can be successful.
On the other hand, some people cannot be effective when they are doing same type of job. Some people constantly seek change and thrill in their life to be productive. For instance, people who like to travel a lot cannot work in a confined space; it will make them mentally ineffective to complete their assigned job. Ergo, some people keep changing their work to get a kick out of the life.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed the different aspect of the given topic. In my opinion, people are unique in their own ways what works for one person may not work for other person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-16 | nevermind12 | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | nevermind12 | 55 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | omer.cinpir | 88 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | ajayvermaETP | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | ajayvermaETP | 55 | view |
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 55
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 55
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 72
- It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to another political figure science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 77
- It is argued that getting married before Finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62962962963 5.00649968141 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42812735851 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514814814815 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8043318808 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1538461538 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225683246376 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996645331094 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617958240948 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140800191434 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652852344896 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.5310837438 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.