Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone?
Recently, the phenomenon of repetitive routine has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “why doing the same thing is preferable for some people?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that avoiding fixed patterns such as changing diet could be constructive, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-psychology standpoint, a sustainable lifestyle is bound up inextricably with healthy habits, which indicates they lead to both motivation and fulfilling life. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between diversifying the experiences and productivity as well as an exponential increase in individuals’ aptitude. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to patterns of behavior, working life, and being extrovert alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of staying effective is correlated positively with not only the wealth of experience but also an active lifestyle.
Within the realm of modern lifestyle, without the slightest doubt, monotonous procedure attribute to tedious and sedentary lifestyle, in that it would come down to solid daily routine and mundane tasks. A salient example of such attribution is challenge refusal, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take ordinary life for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint bread-and-butter work problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to constant repetition, personal life, and even resisting changes. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of having a break from the hustle and bustle of day-to-day life.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that avoiding repetitive routine leads to effective life. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-16 | nevermind12 | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | nevermind12 | 55 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | omer.cinpir | 88 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | ajayvermaETP | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | ajayvermaETP | 55 | view |
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old 55
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 88
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
- Nowadays a lot of offices are being built an open plan design. Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development?. Discuss your opinion and support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1207.87684729 157% => OK
No of words: 328.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7987804878 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34748322803 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 139.433497537 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673780487805 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 379.143842365 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6031973501 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.8 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10228498002 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281065946116 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407350284436 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655198326025 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632770175819 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 55.0591133005 231% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.