Nowadays a lot of offices are being built an open plan design. Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development?. Discuss your opinion and support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Professionals are spending most of their precious time at offices and one of the most common office types is open-office. Some people believe that open office has not boost employees productivity, while others think that it is a super social and cool idea. This essay will explain why open offices are not actually good places to work.
In open offices, people can socialize and share their ideas more easily. Instead of the lack of walls in the open office, employees can communicate face to face and plan their daily activities together without any hesitation. For example, if they have any idea worth to share, they can say it directly and this is actually a good thing. Thus it can be accepted as an advantageous thing for team spirit.
On the other hand, with the open office style, workers could lose their privacies. If they have an issue that should be secret, they will not keep it so long because of workspace style. Additionally, Open offices create not only noise pollution but also a visual distraction. It is quite hard for anybody to focus on one task while his colleagues look at him. So it can be a quite disturbing experience to work at an open office place.
To sum up, the open office issue is quiet controversy among employees. In my opinion, although open offices have some advantages including easy to socialization and idea sharing, it should be restricted in work environments for privacy concerns and different kind of distractions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Hira Shaheen | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Hira Shaheen | 84 | view |
- Nowadays a lot of offices are being built an open plan design. Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development?. Discuss your opinion and support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 75
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old 55
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'boosted'.
Suggestion: boosted
...people believe that open office has not boost employees productivity, while others th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ctly and this is actually a good thing. Thus it can be accepted as an advantageous t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'longs'?
Suggestion: longs
...uld be secret, they will not keep it so long because of workspace style. Additionall...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.872 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70278079022 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6486000486 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145117403311 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575032134629 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345243010776 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940628123251 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240979195214 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.