Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes.
Many people conceive that oversea tourism have an adverse effect for their homeland. This essay will explain the main causes and provide measures to change negativity to this concern.
There are couple of apparent reasons for this conception. First of all, international tourists are often blamed for their damage to the environment. It can be clearly noticed that they litter their neighboring sites irresponsibly, which increase the amount of rubbish in tourism attractions. Although there has been considerable effort by authorities to force waste produced come to a halt, the amount reduced seems to be far from negligible. This contributes dramatically to air, soil, water pollution. Secondly, international tourism can harm traditional customs of the countries by carelessly letting out emotions and feelings to local residents. Some people also wear inappropriate clotes or too expensive pieces of jewelry when visiting poorer places, which can easily lead to contempt from local inhabitants.
To solve these problems, several solutions have been proposed. The government should be stricter and increase fines for people misplacing their rubbish, especially in historic or preserved sites. Moreover the government can explain the benefits of international tourism to the locals, as this plays a crucial part in their income. Besides, international visitors should have a wide knowledge of the places they are traveling to, to ensure they are not misunderstood by the locals.
In conclusion, the unfriendliness of the local people in response to international tourism can be explained and solved within a variety of ways. However, it is the government who have the responsibility to let such negative actions occur.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 61 | view |
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons ? Solutions to change negative attitudes 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to change negativity to this concern. There are couple of apparent reasons for...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to contempt from local inhabitants. To solve these problems, several solutio...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ecially in historic or preserved sites. Moreover the government can explain the benefits...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are not misunderstood by the locals. In conclusion, the unfriendliness of the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57414448669 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07412038432 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623574144487 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9903690821 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242170247893 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778369025912 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569119613404 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149843296461 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372818684362 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.