Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree? Discuss both option and give examples.
In recent time, pet related injuries and mortalities have sparked heated debates about whether it is healthy for children to be around pets. In this essay I shall argue that such dangers are overemphasized and that children receive substantive psychological benefits through having pets.
To begin with, although exotic pets (e.g. snakes, spiders, apes, etc.) have been known to occasionally hurt and even kill children, such incidents are so statistically rare as to be negligible. This is because the overwhelming majority of children have non-lethal cats, fish, rodents and rabbits for pets. For example, the Child Safety Institute found that over 90% of children owned the aforementioned pets, and professed that they had never felt in the last bit endangered by them. Seen in this light, it is clearly unfounded to claim that pets present any physical danger to children.
Secondly, pets can impact positively upon child psychology. This is because young pets owner frequently empathies with their pets and perform a diverse range of actions and maintain their well being (e.g. feeding, grooming, administering medicine, etc.). For example, the Cambridge Developmental Psychology Unit found that children who had grown up with pets were 30% less likely to bully others and resolves conflicts through aggression. Consequently, it is undeniable that a child’s pro-socially and mental health can be improved through exposure to pets.
In conclusion, the cited evidence provides strong support for the view that children owing pets is a good thing. In the future, as more laws are introduced to ban the ownership of illegally acquired exotic pets, this view point will no doubt surge in popularity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-20 | amolsharma44 | 67 | view |
- Nowadays shops have extended opening hours almost every day of the week in many countries. Is it a positive or negative development for shoppers and local community? 77
- some countries have free health services However some people claim that those who live unhealthy lives should not receive free health services 72
- Nowadays online education has become popular as more institutes and companies are offering courses online. However, many people prefer the traditional, classroom training or study. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both methods. 61
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THE PURPOSE OF EDUCATION IS TO PREPARE THE FUTURE WORKFORCE AND MAKES GOOD MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY OTHERS THINK THE PURPOSE OF EDUCATION SHOULD LEED TO SELF FULFILLMENT 80
- Success in today s society is measure in term of wealthy To what extent do you agree with this definition of scuccess should take in to consideration 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...g, grooming, administering medicine, etc.. For example, the Cambridge Developmenta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, e.g., second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38805970149 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86888617903 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2125146066 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139501203342 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053031919477 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355341737623 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876833957403 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113596199114 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.