Do you agree or disagree?
In the busy and crowded world today, we should not expect people to be polite to each other.
Since the dawn of civilization, communities have tried to determine specific behaviors common in order to keep morality of societies high. These characteristics became more important during Renaissance period when people were encouraged to behave nicely. One of the most important of these behaviors is politeness. Since our societies has changed enormously compared to the past, some believe it is not required to be polite toward each other anymore. However, I contend people should remain polite since it is one of not only nice but also essential behaviors of human societies. In the following paragraphs, I will describe most outstanding reasons supporting my viewpoint.
First reason coming to mind is that, these behaviors show how much humans are civilized and separate humans from animals. Most of people coming from a high social class or aristocracy families show a polite and kind behavior towards others, even those whom do not know. For example, royal family of England members always treat and speak with politeness, which shows their high morality standards. Therefore I believe politeness is one of standards you can determine a person’s family class and personality. Polite people are mostly kind and have a high morality personality.
Other equivalently important reason is that, without politeness people will become ruder toward each other, which will make the view and culture of city not interesting. For example, western societies, especially US, mostly are identified by their rude culture in Asian countries because their words most of the time lacks respect and I believe every human being should be respected. Moreover politeness plays a key role in Asian culture and everybody should show respect and politeness towards others and especially old people. Consider Japanese culture, most of people, even of western societies, are amazed by their culture and how they respect each other even their environment.
Finally, I agree that technology has change how we live and our habits. Nowadays we can do our tasks easier compared to the past by means of technology but this technology does not have to lower our standards of morality. Social networks such as Instagram and video games has made younger people more aggressive towards others and has faded the value of nice human behaviors such as politeness. However, I contend younger people have to learn these values and we can utilize social networks to distribute these values among younger people.
So to sum it up, politeness is one of important human behaviors which should be saved and it is an indicator of people’s and their families social class. Also it may seem that today people prefer western culture which is more convenient and does not put an emphasis on politeness, but most people are interested in Asian culture because of their respect and politeness towards anything in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | Mohammadreza1991 | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | rachel24601 | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | Mohammadreza1991 | 76 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | Mohammadreza1991 | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | Mohammadreza1991 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to learn about a foreign country is to read newspaper and magazines from that country. 73
- Many people think that students study course materials more effectively by taking exams while others think that students learn more effectively through doing other activities such as writing paper or completing projects Which do you think is more effectiv 57
- In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... mind is that, these behaviors show how much humans are civilized and separate human...
^^^^
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...lized and separate humans from animals. Most of people coming from a high social class or aris...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ch shows their high morality standards. Therefore I believe politeness is one of standard...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... every human being should be respected. Moreover politeness plays a key role in Asian cu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... old people. Consider Japanese culture, most of people, even of western societies, are amazed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...apos;s and their families social class. Also it may seem that today people prefer we...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25269978402 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73457667397 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481641468683 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 786.6 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2935453129 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.80952381 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0476190476 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2339028063 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700781899354 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495628169827 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129444734072 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318818065988 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.