There has been a never-ending debate on whether the replacement of small local shops by large shopping complexes is a positive change. In my experience, this phenomena has both negative and positive aspects. This essay will discuss why replacing small shops with big malls bears bad as well as good prospects.
To begin with, local shops are the source of employment for local people. However, with the establishment of big malls in local area, people running tiny outlets tend to loose their jobs. The report published by a national newspaper states that, in the area where local retail stores were supplanted by big shopping centers, almost all people who used to run small stores are now unemployed. This shows that the change we have witnessed is a negative change.
Looking at the other side, big shopping malls are the stores where one can purchase a good by selecting from a large variety. In my personal experience, i find it less time consuming and effortless to buy commodities in a big outlet. A recent survey conducted by the association of merchants shows that people prefer to enter a mall to buy goods since they find it easy. This should be taken as a positive change.
In a nutshell, in my perception, while there are positive consequences of superseding small shops by large malls, negative consequences it has brought should not be overlooked.
- Some people argue that experience is the best teacher. Life experiences can teach more effectively than books or formal school education. How far do you agree with this idea? Support your opinion with reasons and/or your personal experience. 80
- Since those issues of Newsbeat magazine that featured political news on their front cover were the poorest-selling issues over the past three years, the publisher of Newsbeat has recommended that the magazine curtail its emphasis on politics to focus more 55
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...is a positive change. In my experience, this phenomena has both negative and positiv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ea, people running tiny outlets tend to loose their jobs. The report published by a n...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rge variety. In my personal experience, i find it less time consuming and effortl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93939393939 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74695706741 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580086580087 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6175102647 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0833333333 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343151545079 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124322868244 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101716493377 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217789677498 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103701958374 0.0609392437508 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.