When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mails, they will produce better work for the project.
At workplaces or schools, it is not rare to see people discussing the projects due in a short time. In order to meet the deadlines of a particular group project, people either communicate face-to-face or by emails. Some might think that to communicate a project in person is better than emails. For me, I believe that both ways are equally important for finishing a project. None of them is replaceable.
Arranging a face-to-face meeting to finish a project for colleagues or classmates is time-saving and it brings unexpected new ideas. Initially, through meeting personally, group members work efficiently, because they get feedbacks instantly. To further explain, face-to-face talking enables participators to discuss various details of a project, rather than wasting time on waiting for replies. In contrast, to get a quick response for a complicated problem regarding a project is not practical if using emails, as replying emails involves typing and modifying formats, which could be time-consuming. Furthermore, not only can interpersonal communication save time, but it also stimulates creativity and aspirations by brain-storming and mind-mapping, which can be easily done by using pens and papers. On the contrary, such benefits can hardly be obtained when emails are used as the primary communication tool in performing a project. However, it is not to say that e-mails do not show any advantages.
E-mails is a great complement media for personal meetings with regard to group projects. Communicating through emails allow people to keep in touch anytime and anywhere as long as internet access is available. To be more specific, for students and employees, who usually deal with several assignments or tasks at the same time, it is emails that facilitate them to set priorities for different tasks. By contrast, when scheduling for a personal meeting, problems such as time conflicts or long travelling distances could be troublesome for students or employees who are already overwhelmed by heavy workload; for those cases mentioned above, e-mails are a more suitable way for communicating. Moreover, writing emails involves more thinking, thus making the responses more effective. Emails containing all the information of a project present good sources for deep-thinking and reflection. The more time people spending on thinking, the higher the quality of a project groups can achieve. However, Insights gained from replying emails can hardly be obtained from personal communications involving more talking and quick decisions.
To conclude, each way of communicating has its cons and pros. Groups in companies or schools usually adopt both to finish a project when aiming for the best performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-05 | sina.tofel | 60 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 76 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Chuppy | 66 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 80 | view |
- In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 71
- Some school require children(5-11岁) to work together instead of working on their own during most of their learning process， do you agree or disagree that is the best way to teach children？ 73
- Some people believe that video games could inspire young students1 interest and make their study more efficient rather than distracting them and a waste of time, so young students should be allowed to play video games 73
- Television advertising directed toward young children(aged two to five) should not be allowed. 76
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44786729858 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16929906266 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9092542838 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286335696641 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870331862604 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061746840883 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191579794305 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041388368479 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.