Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, railways are developing thus some people believe that governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. Although I totally agree with this view but I claim that it is inadequate if governments forget roads.
There are a variety of reasons why should spend money on railways rather than roads. Firstly, railways is moving form that is developing hence it is purely benefits if government invest it. Along with air-communication moving form, railways is not only containing more packages but also being faster so numerous people are big fan of railways. Moreover, in a expanding countries, they often tend to use train on railways instead of other means. For instance, in Japan, people employ train in moving from location to other location. This reduces maximize air pollution so government definitely should spend money on railways. Finally, railways form finds it easy to break so people need fixing it frequently. Railways form need a large of combustibles in order to start up. Therefore, governments need to keep in good repair or inspect oil carefully to protest people safe. For instance, according to the report, American government spend 100 USD on repairing railways in several years and Japan also take 150 USD to create more railways so as to serve people moving demand.
However, government should not over take into consideration but forget the roads. Seeing from reality, many roads downgrades seriously and needs improving to keep people safety. For example, many Vietnamese people said that they have to suffer from downgraded road in every year without announcing about repairing it from government. Thus, governments should care about railways and roads equally because of their importance
In conclusion, I strongly agree that government should spend more money on railways rather than roads in order to promote developing countries but besides that, do not ignore roads
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- tell about your job 61
- Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller? 56
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 95
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e are big fan of railways. Moreover, in a expanding countries, they often tend to...
^
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'country'?
Suggestion: country
...n of railways. Moreover, in a expanding countries, they often tend to use train on railwa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1038, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...so take 150 USD to create more railways so as to serve people moving demand. However, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es but besides that, do not ignore roads
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30592105263 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71886293028 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546052631579 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9517504517 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342638532402 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125863706126 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125730087848 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264527692026 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126602463754 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.