Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the importance of experience and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the skill improvement is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning while working can be a plus and I will scrutinize that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the mentor's advice can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of the valuable experience transformation to the youth, as well as effective education, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, When I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the marvellous value of learning by effective action. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both new methods of successful teaching while working and youngster guidance apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, passive ways of education might increase the consequence of fewer qualified workers. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional ineffective processes of learning would relate to this reality that the demerits of book guideline instructions pertain to mounting unfavourable influences of non-experienced young characters. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of inconsiderable practice is correlated negatively with lack of experience. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of unfortunate people.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of practical learning methods far weigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages of obtaining experience and skills prove the significance of cooperation passion, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement? 88
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 85
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views. 80
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree? 88
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mentors'' or 'mentor's'?
Suggestion: mentors'; mentor's
...s essay. From a social standpoint, the mentors advice can provide the society with som...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78125 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35641423145 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659722222222 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.831341643 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.363636364 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121875663364 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366215123085 0.0925447433944 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343273676344 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599189177784 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446859635271 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.