Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
Recently, the phenomenon of the continuation of mankind and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of human long-life is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that life expectancy improvement can be a plus and I will scrutinize that throughout this essay.
From a knowledge standpoint, high-level of medical care can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of the provided sanitation, as well as living standard’s improvement, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed academic research which discovered the miraculous results of medical developments of the mankind existence. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both better live and high-level human lives apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, human longevity might increase the consequence of bustling population growth rate. Moreover, fundamental aspects of undesirable results of various diseases would relate to this reality that the demerits of the human community's irreversible damages pertain to the increased death flow. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of unfavourable influences of non-medical care is correlated negatively with overpopulated cities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of fewer opportunities for the new generation.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of medical technology far weigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages of life expectancy prove the significance of humankind value, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- In a cashless society, people use more credits. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 11
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 85
- Can political stability hurt economic growth? 89
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 11
- More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74558303887 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35133630158 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660777385159 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2223154049 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.818181818 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198073260144 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571267589828 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366580598849 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101183062027 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387490772905 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.