Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Disscuss both view
Nowadays, with the development of technology, people can connect and share information with each other whenever they want. It is said that sharing as much information in scientific research, business and the academic world as people can is very beneficial while some believe that some data can not be shared public due to its importance. In my opinion, information should be shared freely with community.
On one hand, information in science, business or academic fields can bring about many advantages. When giving as much information as possible, people can raise the proportion of knowledge that individuals can access to. Because of the numerous data shared, people working in these fields can learn and have many experience from many individuals so that they can practice in the real life more efficiently. Moreover, students in related major can consult from this knowledge to get support for their study. In addition, sharing data public can create many forums in which people can put forward their own opinion and discuss with each other. As a result, sometimes people can gain new research or can find drawback for their own study which can boost individuals’ knowledge. Therefore, sharing information can support varied people who wish to gain more knowledge.
On the other hand, keeping some information in the safe place can protect its value. There are various private data which can not be stolen by others because it can contribute to the development of an organization, even in national or global scale. Next point, there are much data which has yet to be certificated or is incorrect, therefore, it can have impact on awareness of people getting access to. Consequently, sharing information freely can cause to many challenges which affect to a wide range of people.
To sum up, there are many special reasons for keeping information from being known. However, certificated or valuable information for academic or other fields should be shared with community due to its benefits.
- The maps show the Islip centre now and its in the future after a plan. 11
- some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extent, do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and the plans for its developments. Summarise the information 78
- The chart below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addtion to English in 2000 and 2010 73
- in number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between locations. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transports. Discuss both 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun experience seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much experience', 'a good deal of experience'.
Suggestion: much experience; a good deal of experience
...king in these fields can learn and have many experience from many individuals so that they can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...or global scale. Next point, there are much data which has yet to be certificated o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21296296296 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82824356579 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6676039308 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257766907216 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113777828219 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974194426302 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209723294247 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113364945254 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.