the procedure of weather forecasting in Australia
The diagram illustrates that the source of real-time information on the weather changing in Australia while providing reliable forecasts.
Overall, the procedure of weather prediction can be separated into four clear steps.
Firstly, the changing tendency of the present weather condition could be quantized and collected by the sensors which are inside the radar, satellite and drifting buoy. Then, the data are visualised to become satellite photo, a real-time diagram with the axis on the screen. It is noteworthy that the synoptic chart should be emerged through aggregate analysing all of the information from 3 sources. At the meantime, people can obtain the result of prediction after the analysis of these diverse sorts of diagrams.
In the next step, the professional information about the weather prediction can be reorganised by the worker in the broadcast. In the end, these outcomes about the weather are demonstrated through 3 channels(TV, radio and recorded announcement).
- Food can be produced more cheaply today because of improved fertilisers and better machinery. However, some people argue that such development may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities.Do you agree or disagree? 70
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- The tables below 11
- many governmet 11
- the procedure of weather forecasting in Australia 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... be emerged through aggregate analysing all of the information from 3 sources. At the mean...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50657894737 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96008037577 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9098095802 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179541922785 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072790332221 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686164230895 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124025188874 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585638918265 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.