What are some important characteristics of a co-worker?
There have been some moot points about the most important characteristics of a co-worker. The question of this issue has aroused as a subject of controversy among psychologists. When it comes to my position, by weighing up the pros and cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that the significant aspects of a colleague are industrious and team working behavior. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that industrious persons have a great impact on our work. These persons do not give up their performance until they reach goals therefore, they have positive effects on our duties. As a case to the point, I vividly remember, when I was a student at the university, I worked in the corporation as a part-time job. In that place, I faced an arduous situation about a project. One of my coworkers was a very industrious and hardworking person who was very accurate in his work. He helped me to solve my difficulty in an easy manner. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that industrious colleagues are very beneficial for us.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that team working behavior has a considerable impact on each job. If there is not a team working manner between workers in the company, they can not fulfill their duties precisely. Thus, likely some confliction disrupts their goals. My personal example demonstrates this reality, I have worked in the company for two years. In that company, there are many workers. One of my co-workers has not team-working behavior toward another worker. The obstacle in our tasks and prevent us to work accurately. Working together is behoove for every member of our company. Hence, our employer fires him. My personal example shed some light on the point that team-working is very lucrative for a coworker.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I would reiterate that there are various characteristics for a good coworker. Everyone has his or her zeitgeist. Personally, I think a good colleague should be an industrious and team-working person. These factors not only boost our performance but also, help us to fulfill our tasks accurately.
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration 88
- Tpo 49 66
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 81
- How do movies or television influence people’s behavior? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 553, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy manner" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rk. He helped me to solve my difficulty in an easy manner. My personal experience competently cor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'behooved'.
Suggestion: behooved
...to work accurately. Working together is behoove for every member of our company. Hence,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, i think, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02122015915 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04867671428 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53050397878 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7179170725 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.72 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.08 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127226079449 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408097309925 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985327942366 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907346977244 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860387018274 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.