Some people think that children should learn to compete, but other think that they should be taught to cooperate with others. What's your opinion?
Over the past decades, education is on e of the greatest problem in our time. Although some people are option that collaboration should be encouraged between students, others claim that individualism and personal achievement seem to important value. In my opinion, cooperative learning is more favorable, despite some of its drawbacks.
On the one hand, cooperative occurs when students work collaboratively towards a common goal. This means, students work together in a small clusters or groups will have a feeling of connection with other members of the group as they accomplish a common goal. Following on from this, not only can it enhance the sense of teamwork among the student but also it can enable students to exercise their communication skills, with much of their learning being involved face to face interaction. Furthermore, working in the group, each member is assigned with a task, which closely matches their strengths, expertise and aptitudes. It raises the possibility of student's marking swift adjustment from school to work when the over comes.
On the other hand, some characteristics of collaborative learning have made it inapplicable on some occasions. Even though collaborative work tends to favor ordinary or slow students with giving them more supports, it turn out that talented, eager students might learn little and become disenchanted over time. This situation can be remedied by encouraging inter-group competition, grouping students and allowing them to compete in groups. Therefore, individualism will make motivation for students who have independently thinking and readily for compete to protect their ideas.
Taking the above I have mentioned, teacher should identify the best style for students and predict its outcome, either destructive or constructive. Collaborative learning brings more benefits, despite the possibility of impeding outstanding student's personal development, a problem which should be handled with caution.
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history in their country Why is this What can be done to increase young people s interest in famous people in the history of their country 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle. Both schools and parents are responsible for solving this problem. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 89
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history in their country Why is this What can be done to increase young people s interest in famous people in the history of their country 89
- Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orable, despite some of its drawbacks. On the one hand, cooperative occurs when...
^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to be'.
Suggestion: to be
...ion skills, with much of their learning being involved face to face interaction. Furt...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...aracteristics of collaborative learning have made it inapplicable on some occasions....
^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'turns'?
Suggestion: turns
...ents with giving them more supports, it turn out that talented, eager students might...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich should be handled with caution.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6632996633 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10462542007 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609427609428 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6014395656 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192428827052 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678287954665 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550057985979 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129177934751 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485375366398 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.