Given bar chart depicts someland's major exports 2005,2015 and proposed future sales in 2025. First a glance it is noted that meat product showed a negative trend while the international tourism witnessed a forward trend, at the same time diary products turned up with an earticle pattern.
Firstly, meat products stood at 4 billion at the beginning of the period, experienced a gradual decline and reached around 3.5 billion in 2015, which is proposed to fall further in2025 to set as low as 3 billion. On the otherhand, diary products accounted for 5 billion U S dollar at the initial period witnessed an exponential growth in next period and attained a peak value of 8 billion, but predicted to drop sales by a half billion in 2025.
At last the international tourism, which was at 6 billion in 2005 showed a study and gradual growth throughout the period to reach 7 billion in 2015 and supposed to hit a peak at the end of the period.
Overall, diary products and international tourism predicted to gain in the coming future in contrast meat products may loss their popularity up to an extent.
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to teach their parents parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 22
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and reached around 3.5 billion in 2015, which is proposed to fall further in2025...
^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m, which was at 6 billion in 2005 showed a study and gradual growth throughout th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, may, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76963350785 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73607175507 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9262694133 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.833333333 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0720944816024 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552307563916 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776219255308 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0493175021848 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370100789205 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.