Society seems to pay less attention to women's sports than to men's sports. Why do you think this is the case? Is it a positive or negative trend?
Sports are enjoyed by everyone. However, it is a common belief that, less attention is devoted towards the women's sports in our society due to various reasons. I do believe that, it is a negative development.
To begin with, due to many reasons women's sports often not welcomed as same as men's sports. Since many societies are male dominated, they love to watch the males sports. Despite of watching the women's sports, audience likes to see them as cheerleaders, commentators and in the advertisement. Although strong marketing companies are ready to fund for the men's sports, this is not in the case of women's sports. To cite an example, in the cricket premier league in India, with male players, received a marketing budget of 1 million in 2017. In contrast, the world cup winners of the Indian women's cricket team was unnoticed because of the lack of funding and support from the government and media.
I think this is a negative trend and will create many issues in the society. If this type of development continues, it will increase the gender gap in society. That is why, many wives of famous players recognized in the society by only with their husband's name. Even if media encourage the women's sports, many women nay got motivated to do many things in their lives. Hence, women those who are not only talented in sports, but also experts in other fields come forward. Having collaborative efforts of both men and women would affect the economy of a country in a positive way.
To summarize this topic, I would like to emphasize that, women's sports should give same importance like men's sports since it will cut the gender gap. Then of course country will get social and economic benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-29 | priyankarasiri | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | Ania | 56 | view |
- The bar diagram below shows the number of houses per year in 2 cities, Derby and Nottingham between 2000 and 2009. 73
- Most developed countries spend a large proportion of their health budgeys on expensive medical technology and procedures. This money should be spent instead on health education to keep people well. To what extent do you agree with this 61
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- First impressions are important Some people think that doing well in interviews is the key to securing a good job To what extent do you agree 53
- Few artists ever manage to achieve fame let alone a liveable wage Often artists struggle to make ends meet for most of their lives For this reason some people believe that it is irresponsible for a parent to encourage their child to pursue an artistic car 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n would affect the economy of a country in a positive way. To summarize this topic, I would l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, i think, in contrast, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 294.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80612244898 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5212067368 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8038102268 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1176470588 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282561683558 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08584692082 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572121872812 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161984061856 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381830499154 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.