In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old
people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has
to pay for this care.
Who should be responsible for our old people?
Many old people in Britain, after a lifetime of hard work and the toil of bringing up children,
are put into homes for the elderly by their families. There, they are looked after by
professional nurses, and this is sometimes at the expense of the government. However,
this situation has raised controversy about whether we extend to our elders the care and
respect they deserve.
The critics of this system say that it is the duty of the family to look after its senior
members in the years when they are no longer able to work. They point out that in
retirement homes old people tend to feel useless and unwanted by their family members,
who seldom come to see them. In addition, there is evidence that younger people benefit
from the experience and wisdom of older people who live with them on a daily basis.
On the other had, those who support the system say that retired parents can be a burden
to young families. Not only is it expensive to support old people who have little or no
income, but the fact that old people are often ill and need a great deal of looking after can
be too much for their busy children.
In my opinion, neither side is completely right. Old people in good health and with enough
finances to support themselves can be a great help to their children. For instance, they
can look after their grandchildren while children are out at work. On the other had, sick
and penniless old people are
- The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twentyyears. Many of the problems young people now experience, such as juveniledelinquency, arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their childr 84
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other oldpeople where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government hasto pay for this care.Who should be responsible for our old people? 61
- Which way do you prefer to spend time: with a small number of close friends or with many friends?Compare these two views. 67
- Some people prefer to work for a large company.Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer?Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 84
- Which way do you prefer to spend time: with a small number of close friends or with many friends?Compare these two views. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, while, for instance, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62015503876 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29801491373 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3417330175 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.38176352705 411% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373377312477 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129462848199 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568291773354 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109425575674 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384579349018 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.