It is thought by some individuals that is good to live in a globalised world but some people disagree that it would be beneficial for them. Personally, I feel that the globalisation have both positive as well as negative development on today’s life. This essay will discuss the both development in upcoming paragraphs.
There are several negative development due to globalisation. Firstly, it effects to our environment because big companies demands more products that means there will have to be make more factories. Therefore, increased number of factories and transportation will lots of air and water pollution. Hence, it increases global warming which cause floods to wipe out cities and farms. Probing ahead, the second negative development due to globalisation is depletion of natural resources. Although, big organisations demand more resources to be used for more products. Moreover, there would not be enough resource left for future generations to use. Since, future generation will be advance.
However, there are some people who support globalisation and suggest benefits to individuals and global community. First of all, supporters of globalisation claim that result economic growth, quicker access to new technology, cheaper imports and greater competition. Furthermore, they also argue that globalisation will make the world economy more efficient and will continue to make hundreds millions of jobs mainly in developing countries. Also, it would help the developing countries to get more foreign jobs in big firms like Apple, Samsung, and so on. Despite of this, consumer also make profit from globalisation. Though, purchase items in cheaper rate and then sale them in high rate.
In conclusion, I believe that globalisation is bad because it cause many unwanted things. It moves domestic jobs to cheaper places which cause people lose their jobs. Also, it causes the environment to deteriorate and global warming and destroy the local culture.
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local language. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local l 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 61
- The charts and the pie show the number of students at university in a particular European country, the government's annual spending on each student between 1984 and 2009, and the percentages of students' economic family background. 78
- The line graph shows the number of people who moved from four European countries to the United States of America. 73
- summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...at the globalisation have both positive as well as negative development on today's li...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rce left for future generations to use. Since, future generation will be advance. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...ve that globalisation is bad because it cause many unwanted things. It moves domestic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, well, i feel, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51315789474 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02928201316 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598684210526 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8498097407 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146679989037 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452023752605 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433255633019 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933623952971 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402185036371 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.