The given column, line and pie chart illustrate the student strength of a specific university of Europe, the young expenditure done by the government on each student and the proportion of students as per their family’s financial status. A cursory glance at the graph is enough to make it clear that the number of students increased, whereas the government funding on them decreased over time.
From the column graph it is clear that 150000 students studied at the university in 1984. This number increased with fluctuation and reached 400000 by 2008. The line graph depicts that the government spent the maximum ($14000) per student annually in 1984. This spending decreased gradually and reached $10000/ student by 2004. After that this funding increased and become 12000 dollars by 2008. From the pie chart it is manifest that slight more than half came from high income families. A little over a quarter came low income families and slightly more than a fifth came from middle income families.
Overall, the maximum student at University were from high income families. It is surprising to see that more students came from low income than from middle income families.
- The charts and the pie show the number of students at university in a particular European country the government s annual spending on each student between 1984 and 2009 and the percentages of students economic family background 65
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 61
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects. But, others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find the most interest. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 71
- Most people accept that we now live in globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development? 84
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local language. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local l 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10362694301 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51161226968 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492227979275 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4916304803 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5454545455 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311976359585 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127201843889 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103319303723 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232621924929 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105302251693 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.