Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both view and give your opinion
The consumption of sugar is quite a topic of debate among many people. It is often argued that the excessive intake of sugar should be controlled by government authorities, whereas others believe that the sugar consumption in daily diet should be regulated at personal level. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and will explain why governments' efforts are more imperative.
There are certain valid reasons due to which people tend to believe that higher authorities are responsible for reducing the use of sugar. Firstly, governments can impose heavy taxes on sugary items that might lead to reducing the sale of those products. In Australia, for instance, it has been seen that after increasing the taxes on such products, people start avoiding those products. Secondly, governments can arrange awareness campaigns to educate public about the ill effects of sugar. A good illustration for this is that many people have been influenced by governments social media campaigns and have declined the use of sugar in their everyday food. Due to aforementioned reasons people have opinion that governments can take preventive measures to control sugar in daily use.
On the contrary, it is said that regulation of sugar intake in diet is feasible at an individual level. Every person has his own metabolic rate and knows his limitations about how to control the sugar level. For example, a person who consumes higher sugar can look after the sugar concentration in the body by doing regular exercises. In addition to this, by changing routine diet plan and strict check on sugar intake, various diseases can be avoided. Hence, with the help of exercise and disciplined diet, sugar level in the body can be regulated. However, I believe, in the present day, these methods are difficult to follow.
In conclusion, although sugar level can be controlled by proper workout and limited use of sweet products, I strongly believe that the legislative powers can play a pivotal role in reducing the consumption of sugar by levying heavy taxes and awareness campaigns. This would lead to a effective measure and everyone can live a healthy life.
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both view and 78
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 71
- Write a letter to your manager who is leaving the company.In your letter, you should:•include how you are feeling about this•what you did like about working with him/her•ask questions about his/her future plan 89
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both view and 73
- Your friend wants to come to your city and stay with you for one week for a holiday. However, it is impossible for you to accompany him. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter, you should:1) Apologize to your friend2) Explain why you cannot stay wi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...awareness campaigns. This would lead to a effective measure and everyone can live...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14613180516 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74339103414 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535816618911 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0132867916 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.647058824 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259903621071 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871374297118 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489774693528 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156178229585 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385667877193 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.