The graph illustrates the amount of CO2 emissions per head in four countries (United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that the average CO2 emissions in United Kingdom and Sweden declined during 50 years. In contrast, there was the growth of CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal in the same periods.
United Kingdom produced the most CO2 emissions in 4 countries and peaked of around 11 metric tonnes in 1967. Affter 10 years, there was no change in the quantity CO2 emissions. However, from 1977 to 2007, CO2 emissions decreased gradually and hit a low of more 8 metric tonnes in 2007. In Sweden, from over 8 metric tonnes in 1967, the amount of CO2 emissions climbed dramatically in 10 years and peaked off 10 metric tonnes in 1977. After that, the trend was downward with 6 metric tonnes in 2007.
In 1967, over average 4 metric tonnes per head released in Italy, compared to average around 1 metric tonnes per head in Portugal. Then the amount of emissions increased gradually and reached a high of under 8 metric tonnes in Italy and around 5 metric tonnes in Portugal in 1997. After that, the amount of CO2 emissions remained steady in both countries.
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group Iin2002 It includes those with a degree whose with a higher degree postgraduate and those with other qualifications 47
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 78
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- In school and universities, girls tend to choose art while boys like science. What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed? 56
- In school and universities, girls tend to choose art while boys like science. What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... After that, the amount of CO2 emissions remained steady in both countries.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 206.0 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70616113744 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44182096224 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 127.690721649 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454976303318 0.622605031667 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 290.88556701 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.415518477 44.8134815571 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2727272727 76.5299724578 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 4.34317383033 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223631011689 0.216113520407 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110820103112 0.0766984524023 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717029791887 0.0603063233224 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188840154126 0.12726935374 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735206792152 0.0580467560999 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 8.37731958763 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 8.71597938144 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 7.59969072165 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 41.2886597938 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.