The line chart illustrates the percentage of radio and television viewers in the UK from October to December in 1992.
Overall, it can be seen that the rate of televion viewer was higher than the rate of radio listeners. While human enjoyed watching TV in the evening, British liked to listen radio in the morning.
From 1 a.m to 6 a.m, the proportion of radio audiences was low (under 5%). After that, there was a dramatic increase in radio listeners and peaked of 25% at 9 a.m. Then, the level of radio listeners dropped sharly. It was around 10% at 5 p.m. In the evening, the audiences of radio remained steady about 5%.
In the morning, the rate of TV viewers was around 5%. However, this rate increased by triple. From 1 p.m to 4 p.m the rate remained stable (about 15%). In the evening, the rate of viewers went up considerably and hit a peak of 45% at 8 p.m. After that, the level of viewers decreased gradually and remaind over 15%.
- the graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 79
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 61
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Cement and concrete production 56
- In school and universities, girls tend to choose art while boys like science. What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43352601156 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4488758407 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4891984444 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0783452438922 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371285802675 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353682200436 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055569928792 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038123528907 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.