The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
The graph illustrates information about daily radio and television audiences in the UK from October to December in 1992.
Looking at the details, as regards the proportion of TV viewers, it started at nearly 2% at 6 AM. Then, the figure fluctuated slightly during the morning until it overtook the rate of radio listeners at 1 PM. After that, it saw a significant growth, reaching a peak of 44% at 8 PM. From this time onwards, the number plunged, finishing at around 1% of British watched TV at 5 PM.
By contrast, the level of radio listeners went in the opposite direction. Standing at about 8% at 6 AM, the figure then rose sharply, peaking at approximately 25% at 9 AM. Afterwards, the number of radio audiences experienced a gradual decline and then it hit the lowest at 4 PM.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that there were more TV audiences than the radio ones throughout the day. Another interesting point is that UK people preferred listening to the radio in the morning, whereas watching TV was the more suitable choice in the evening.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...8 PM. From this time onwards, the number plunged, finishing at around 1% of Briti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, then, whereas, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73913043478 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8312661572 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9017466583 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.2 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995162340225 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527106526361 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650279948557 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900254341055 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683392550418 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.