Percentage of students proficient in a foreign language in different countries in 2000.
The bar chart compares the rates of students in different nations in terms of the competence in a foreign language in the year 2000.
It is clear that Indian students were most proficient in a second language. Additionally, apart from Thailand, female students were better at learning a foreign language than males in all other countries.
Regarding the figures of students having a competence in a second language in India, Romania and China, the numbers of male and female students in India were highest, standing at nearly 70% and 56%. Followed by Romania, the proportion of female learners was slightly lower than that of India, at around 65%, however the figure of males was significantly lower, at roundly 42%. At that time, China saw the lowest rates in both genders, and particularly China had over three times less male students mastering an overseas language than India.
Turning to the other remaining countries, 56% and 38% were the rates of learners being good at an abroad language in Vietnam, higher than the figures of Russia and Thailand. Meanwhile, Thailand was the only nation the percentage of male students mastering a second language was higher than that of females, a difference of 5%. Finally, Russia saw the proportions of males and females were 42% and 35% respectively.
- The bar chart compares consumer spending on six different items in Germany, Italy, France, and Britain. 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012. 11
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 47
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people’s behavior. What is your opinion? 73
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one's own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, regarding, second, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07441860465 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69877283171 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53023255814 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9694403854 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244115125465 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118568222653 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100469073748 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189276260987 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920401389724 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.