"Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
The argument states that they should invest their resouces in unmanned space flights as they are better than manned space filghts because in the process lives of people are not being risked. The author cites that manned flight is costly and dangerous. However, the argument is rife with holes and flaws and there are several unstated assumptions that need to be conformed before a proper conclusion can be made.
To begin, the author assumes that the recent success of unmanned space probes guarantees its future success. However, this does not have to be true. For instance, the unmanned space probes perhaps, would have needed only images and other static information, but this is not always the case. To do efficient observation and interpretation human mind is a necessity. Further, if men and women are not sent on the flight we might need to create advanced technological machines to fill the space of the human mind. Therefore, this does not guarantee future success of unmanned space flights. The author has to produce specific evidence, the useful information that was gathered was enough for the research and will be so in the future, to strenghten his argument.
Furthermore, the author assumes that manned space flights are so dangerous that men and women would be reluctant to go on such space probes. For example, how dangerous are such space flights? What are the chances of people losing their lives? These questions need to be answered and in terms of probabilty. And as it turns out, some individuals may not consider it as risky as other people do. Therefore, to come to a unanimous decision, the author has to seek proper evidence from the research team about risk calculation, perhaps from past manned space probes and only then come to conclusion. Moreover, was the useful information collected enough? Would sending people on space probes had provided us with better information? The author assumes answers to these questions. If the above assumptions do not hold true and in fact, people are willing to take their chances or maybe, if people in space flights would have provided us with better information, then the argument does not hold water.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is considerably flawed due to its reliance on several unwarranted assumptions. If the author is able to produce specific evidence (perhaps in the form of some systematic research) to support her assumptions, like past success being extrapolated to future success and the danger to life in manned space flights, only then, can the argument be efficiently evaluated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | riyarmy | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | BusariMoruf | 55 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 55
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 63
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 58
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sendin 33
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-essays/following-opinion-was-provided-l…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 427 350
No. of Characters: 2103 1500
No. of Different Words: 187 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.546 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.925 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.551 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 160 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.409 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.118 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.304 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.45 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 911, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had provided'?
Suggestion: had provided
...es or maybe, if people in space flights would have provided us with better information, then the ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 427.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07025761124 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67059645137 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475409836066 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.1778241454 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4090909091 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4090909091 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.59090909091 5.70786347227 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314602483701 0.218282227539 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923430762602 0.0743258471296 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692626919216 0.0701772020484 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193393040543 0.128457276422 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049966243191 0.0628817314937 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 98.500998004 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.